Center

Dedicant's Work

Study Program

Runes

Esus

Definitions

Rituals

Essays

Poems

Biography
---------
Search

LiveJournal

email

links
---------
Chronarchy.org

adf.org

ThreeCranes.org

Pagan Student Association

---------
CafePress Shop

rss
Chronarchy.Com

Divination 2, Question 1

Describe the geographical and temporal distribution of your chosen symbol set. If the symbol set was used cross-culturally, describe how each culture used your chosen symbol set. (min. 300 words)

The runic script first appears in the northwest of Germany in the first century AD. Where the runes came from is up for debate, but very few scholars will claim that they developed on their own in Germany without influence.

Supporting a possible "spontaneous generation" might be the fact that the earliest runic inscriptions date to that first century AD, and they are found in the northwest portion of Germany. At this particular point in history, the main alphabets that could have influenced the script were the Latin and Greek alphabets, both of which really only show a passing resemblance to the Germanic script.

Interestingly, it is a non-Indo-European script that is usually pointed to as the source: the Etruscan alphabet. A quick comparison reveals identical (or nearly so) symbols for a variety of letters, including (but not limited to) U, A, C (k), I, T, M, L, and D. The ratio of identical letters to total letters (10:24) is enough to show possible descent.¹

The runes appear to have been used from the first century AD until approximately 1100 AD² (though arguments can be made to stretch this into the 1800's, where the Dalecarlian runes finally go extinct). The period from 100 AD until 600 AD is usually thought of as the "older runic inscriptions", but this varies by geography.

It is probably easiest to say, "Where there were speakers of a Germanic language during these time periods, there were runes," for they are found in all Germanic languages developed during this time. There are even arguments that the famous Kensington Runestone (most likely a forgery) is, in fact, real, putting the geography of runes stretching as far west as Minnesota. Realistically, we can say that runes were used in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Germany, Poland, Russia, Hungary, Romania, and the British Isles.³

The runes appear to have been used exclusively in Germanic-speaking countries, but I have speculation from Tacitus' Germania that the runes may have been used by Celts near the Rhine or in Belgium as well. Given Tacitus' proclivity for mixing up the Germans and the Gauls, it is entirely possible that chapter 10 of the Germania is actually about a Gaulish tribe. I would not say, though, that the use might have been extensive enough to be considered truly "cross-cultural."†

Sources:

¹ - Elliott, Ralph W. V. Runes: an Introduction. New York: St. Martinís Press. 1989. p. 8

² - Page, R. I. Runes. London: British Museum Publications. 1987. p. 9

³ - Page, R. I. Runes. London: British Museum Publications. 1987. p. 10

† - Tacitus, Cornelius. The Life of Agricola and The Germania. William Francis Allen, ed. Boston: The Athenaeum Press. 1913.

>----------'-|-|||||-,,--||||-/////-|||||-,,,,--|-,,-,,-'--|-|||||-,,--''-|||||-,,,,-''''-||-/////-''-|||||-|-<

Content © 2003-2007, Michael J Dangler
Updated on 08/02/2007. Site Credits / Email Me!
Basic site design from ADF.org
(Yes, I stole it!)